Ayodhya Verdict: What ASI found in Ayodhya that decided the fate of dispute?
Ayodhya Ram Mandir-Babri Masjid Verdict – The Supreme Court has given its verdict in the Ayodhya case. The court said that the disputed land belongs to Ramlalla.
Ayodhya Verdict: The five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, in a unanimous verdict said that it was found in evidence that Hindus had courtyard there. Supreme Court bench also said that proof of offering Namaz was found in the same place. Supreme Court said in its ruling that disputed Ayodhya site belongs to Hindus, and 5 acres of land to be given to Sunni Waqf Board
Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi said in the verdict that ASI excavation has found proofs of Hindu structure. SC said that Hindus were used to offer prayers before 1856 in the premises. It was also said that when Hindus were not allowed to worship inside the structure they started offering prayers outside the main structure.
ASI’s Ayodhya Excavation
Archeological Survey of India (ASI) excavated the disputed site for investigation on the directions of the Allahabad High court. There were two excavations conducted at the disputed Ayodhya site, first in 1976-77 and then in 2003. The ASI submitted evidence in the court found in the excavation of 2003. ASI started excavation on the disputed land on the directives of Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court. ASI conducted Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey to save mosque from demolition. The excavation project was conducted between 12 March 2003 to 7 August 2003. This task was completed with the help of a company named Tojo Development International.
What ASI found?
• ASI excavations have found remains dating back to the 13th century BC. Among the ruins found in the excavations are the remains of the Kushan and Shung periods to the Gupta period and the early middle ages.
• It was said in the report that a platform of 15×15 meters was also found in the excavation that resembles some important object was placed in the centre of this platform.
• The circular temple was believed to be from the 7th to the 10th century. The structure of 50 meters north-south building of the early 11-12th century was found. There was one more structure of another huge building was found whose floor was made in three attempts.
• According to the ASI report, the disputed structure (mosque) was built in the 16th century on top of the ruins of this building.
• ASI found 50 pillars in its excavations which is located right under the Gumbad of disputed structure (mosque).
• ASI also mentioned in its report that they have found ruins of other eras also. These ruins could be the ruins of Buddhist or Jain temples.
Also Read | Ayodhya Verdict Out: All you need to know
Allahabad High Court’s decision
The Allahabad High Court’s decision came on 30 September 2010 on the Ayodhya dispute. In this decision, the court ordered the 2.77 acres of land to be distributed between the Sunni Waqf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and Ramlalla Virajman. This order of the court was challenged in the Supreme Court. After a long hearing, five judges bench of the Supreme Court has given its verdict.
Background of Ayodhya Case
• Ayodhya is considered the birthplace of Rama. The Hindus claim that there was a temple here, which was demolished and a mosque was built. At the same time, the claim of the Muslim community is completely the opposite.
• It is believed that Mir Baqi, the commander of the Mughal ruler Babur, built the mosque in Ayodhya that was known as Babri Masjid.
• In 1959 Nirmohi Akhara filed a case for transfer of case of the disputed site. At the same time, on behalf of Muslims, the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Waqf Board filed a case for ownership of Babri Masjid.
• On 30 October 1990, Karseva was organized for the first time for the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi movement in Ayodhya. Karsevaks climbed the mosque and hoisted the flag. After this, five Karsevaks were killed in police firing.
• On 6 December 1992, thousands of karsevaks reached Ayodhya and demolished the Babri Masjid. Temporary Ram temple was built.
• On 30 September 2010, The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court gave a historic verdict. As per the verdict, the disputed land was divided into three parts – Ramlalla Virajman, Sunni Waqf Board and the Nirmohi Akhara.
Download our Current Affairs & GK app For exam preparation
डाउनलोड करें करेंट अफेयर्स ऐप एग्जाम की तैयारी के लिए